Patriot Torqx 128GB SSD Review

Written by Harry Butler

July 3, 2009 | 11:55

Tags: #128gb #boot-time #performance #random-write #review #speeds #ssd #tested #testing

Companies: #arm #indilinx #patriot #patriot-memory

FC-Test Results

Website: FC-Test

Our FC-Test benchmark is split into three parts. First is a write test involving the creation of a file pattern similar to common files such as MP3s or large video files. Once created on the drive, we then copy the file pattern from the drive back to a different folder on the same drive producing a combined read/write test. Finally we test the read speed of the drive by performing FC-Test's read test on the files copied.

For our benchmarks, we're using both the MP3 pattern, consisting of two hundred and seventy small files totalling 0.99GB, and the the ISO pattern, consisting of three large files totalling 1.6GB in size. We feel these represent the most common files people will be frequently copying to and from an drive, and can be interpreted as as close to a real world file transfer test as possible.

FC Test

ISO File Create on Drive

  • Intel X25-E 32GB SSD
  • Corsair P256 256GB SSD
  • Patriot Torqx 128GB SSD (1571 firmware)
  • OCZ Vertex 120GB v.1.1
  • G.Skill Falcon 128GB
  • Western Digital VelociRaptor 300GB
  • Seagate 1TB 7200.12
  • Samsung SpinPoint F1 1TB
  • Seagate 1.5TB Barracuda 7200.11
  • Intel X25-M 80GB SSD v8820
  • Seagate 1TB 7200.11
  • Western Digital 150GB 10,000RPM Raptor
  • G.Skill Titan 256GB SSD
  • Seagate 250GB 7200.10
  • OCZ Apex 120GB SSD
  • G.Skill 128GB SSD
  • Patriot Warp V.2 128GB SSD
    • 8.1
    • 11.2
    • 13.0
    • 13.5
    • 13.5
    • 18.1
    • 21.4
    • 21.7
    • 21.9
    • 23.0
    • 23.9
    • 27.6
    • 31.2
    • 34.5
    • 35.8
    • 47.7
    • 48.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
Time (seconds)
  • Time (Seconds)

Dealing with the larger ISO file pattern the updated v1571 firmware again offers minor improvements over the v1370 equipped Vertex and Falcon, although it's still not able to match the amazing sequential write speed of the P256 when dealing with larger files. However, the Torqx still offers a forty percent improvement over a 1TB mechanical hard disk drive - a serious step up in performance.

FC Test

ISO File Copy to Drive

  • Corsair P256 256GB SSD
  • Intel X25-E 32GB SSD
  • Patriot Torqx 128GB SSD (1571 firmware)
  • OCZ Vertex 120GB v.1.1
  • G.Skill Falcon 128GB
  • G.Skill Titan 256GB SSD
  • Western Digital VelociRaptor 300GB
  • OCZ Apex 120GB SSD
  • Seagate 1TB 7200.12
  • Seagate 1.5TB Barracuda 7200.11
  • Samsung SpinPoint F1 1TB
  • Patriot Warp V.2 128GB SSD
  • Seagate 250GB 7200.10
  • G.Skill 128GB SSD
  • Seagate 1TB 7200.11
  • Western Digital 150GB 10,000RPM Raptor
  • Intel X25-M 80GB SSD v8820
    • 11.3
    • 11.5
    • 12.9
    • 15.5
    • 15.6
    • 16.7
    • 17.1
    • 17.6
    • 18.1
    • 19.2
    • 19.9
    • 22.0
    • 22.2
    • 23.0
    • 23.2
    • 23.6
    • 24.7
0
5
10
15
20
25
Time (seconds)
  • Time (Seconds)

It certainly looks as though the v1571 firmware has been optimsed to deal better with copying larger files, with the v1571 equipped Torqx outpacing the older firmware powered Vertex and Falcon by a whopped 2.5 seconds, or over eighteen percent! While still not as fast as the X25-E or Corsair P256, this really isn't too far off, and really shows how Indilinx has been hard at work to improve the performance of it's drive controller. Incidentally, we're still waiting for the first firmware update for Samsung's ARM drive controller as well.

FC Test

ISO File Read From Drive

  • Patriot Torqx 128GB SSD (1571 firmware)
  • Intel X25-M 80GB SSD v8820
  • G.Skill Falcon 128GB
  • Intel X25-E 32GB SSD
  • OCZ Vertex 120GB v.1.1
  • Corsair P256 256GB SSD
  • OCZ Apex 120GB SSD
  • G.Skill Titan 256GB SSD
  • G.Skill 128GB SSD
  • Patriot Warp V.2 128GB SSD
  • Seagate 1.5TB Barracuda 7200.11
  • Seagate 1TB 7200.12
  • Western Digital VelociRaptor 300GB
  • Samsung SpinPoint F1 1TB
  • Seagate 1TB 7200.11
  • Seagate 250GB 7200.10
  • Western Digital 150GB 10,000RPM Raptor
    • 6.9
    • 7.0
    • 7.3
    • 7.4
    • 7.5
    • 8.1
    • 8.3
    • 8.6
    • 11.1
    • 11.2
    • 13.2
    • 13.3
    • 13.7
    • 14.7
    • 15.2
    • 17.3
    • 18.4
0
5
10
15
20
Time (seconds)
  • Time (Seconds)

Again, the improved firmware does the trick here, lifting the Indilinx powered Torqx to the top spot with a read time of 6.9 seconds, just faster than the Intel X25-M.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

TOP STORIES

SUGGESTED FOR YOU